|
DECEPTION AND FALSEHOOD PROPAGATED BY THE CHRISTIAN WEB SITE http://www.answering-islam.org/Silas/bible.htm IMPORTANT ADDITIONS
Under the article entitled MUHAMMAD AND THE BIBLE by Silas You shall discover the following sub-titles PART 1 THE BIBLE IS
TRUE ACCORDING TO ISLAM
The word "BIBLE" and/or the phrase "THE HOLY BIBLE" or their Arabic equivalents did not appear in the Qur'an that Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) used to recite in his days. Neither do they appear in the copies of the Qur'an that the Muslims do recite today. Furthermore, if one was to do the key-word search for the words BIBLE, OLD TESTAMENT or NEW TESTAMENT within the majority of the translated ENGLISH TEXTS of the Glorious Qur'an, the results would be ZERO. In other words, these words or phrases DO NOT appear in these translated texts of the Qur'an. To claim that the author of this article - Silas, (which could be a pen name) who uses the following sub-heading, was in reality not aware of the above mentioned facts, is to say that the author's work could not be relied upon. To say otherwise, would be to admit that Silas is the master of DECEPTION. C. THE QURAN STATES THAT THE BIBLE IS TRUE
The Book of Abraham
The Book of Moses
It is absolutely incorrect or rather a folly
to claim that "The Taurat" refers
to the collection of the 39 Books of "The Old Testament". It is an indisputable
fact that this entire collection of 39 Books was not Revealed to Prophet
Moses. Similarly, it is ALSO incorrect to assert that the First
Five Books of the Old Testaments called "The Pentateuch" (lit. "The Five
Books"), which are often erroneously declared as the "Five Books of Moses",
were Revealed to Prophet Moses. The Bible Scholars (mostly Christians
and Jews), who have examined The Pentateuch (Five Books attributed to Moses),
have discovered four or more main sources underlying them.
1. J = Yahwistic Text. Written
by the authors in the time of
Note: In the First Four
Books of Moses, the Priestly Writers used both
Below is the irrefutable proof that Prophet Moses did not write or dictate "The Pentateuch". The following historical account that appears in the end part of "The Pentateuch" and records what did transpire after the death of Moses could neither be qualified as Revealed by Allah Himself to Prophet Moses nor as The Book written or dictated by Moses nor as The text written during the lifetime of Moses. As seen earlier, the Qur'anic Term "The Taurat" refers specifically to the Revealed Transcript by Allah Himself to His Prophet Moses and within this Revealed Transcript was "The Guidance and the Light." A Muslim is asked in the Qur'an to believe in this "Taurat" and not in everything that is identified or published as "The Books of Moses" in the Bible. Here are two eye-opening passages from "The Fifth Book of Moses" which is known as "Deuteronomy": "Moses was one hundred twenty years old when he died; his sight was unimpaired and his vigor had not abated. The Israelites wept for Moses in the plains of Moab thirty days; then the period of mourning for Moses was ended" Deuteronomy 34: 7-8The above text upholds the theory of Priestly and other Sources in The Pentateuch. The above text can be qualified as the history of Moses written by the historians. But certainly cannot be declared or qualified as; "The true Taurat that was revealed or bestowed upon Prophet Moses by the Almighty Allah". The Injeel/Gospel bestowed on
Jesus Christ
The Book given to David
The Books sent to the earlier
Prophets
Say ye: "We believe in Allah and the revelation given to us and to Abraham, Ismai'l, Isaac, Jacob and the Tribes and that given to Moses and Jesus and that given to (all) Prophets from their Lord we make no difference between one and another of them and we bow to Allah (in Islam)." 2: 136 Translation by Abdullah Yusuf AliIn the Bible there are no books written by or ascribed to the prophets Abraham (Ibrahim), Ishmael (Isma'il), Isaac (Is-haq) and/or Jacob (Ya'qub). IS THE "THE TRUTH" OR "ANOTHER DECEIT" BY SILAS? In his article under the rebuttal, Silas writes the following: Many Muslims today say the Bible is corrupted. But there is nothing in the Quran that supports this. There is not one word in the Quran that teaches that the Scriptures of the Jews and Christians have been perverted by man. Instead, the opposite is true. The Quran supports the Bible.READ THE QUR'ANIC VERSES AND YOU BE THE JUDGE... Allah did aforetime take a Covenant from the Children of Israel and We appointed twelve captains among them and Allah said: "I am with you: if ye (but) establish regular prayers practice regular charity believe in My apostles honor and assist them and loan to Allah a beautiful loan verily I will wipe out from you your evils and admit you to gardens with rivers flowing beneath; but if any of you after this resisteth faith he hath truly wandered from the path of rectitude." 5: 12The changing of "the words from their (right) places" within "the Message that was sent them", is NOT considered "the corruption of the Scriptures" by Silas!!! We certainly gave the Book to Moses but differences arose therein: had it not been that a Word had gone forth before from thy Lord the matter would have been decided between them: but they are in suspicious doubt concerning it. Glorious Qur'an 11: 110The Ark of the Covenant The so called Fifth Book of Moses - Deuteronomy, records that Prophet Moses made an Ark of acacia wood and cut two tablets of stone like the ones he had received on the mountain, while God spoke to him. As God had commanded him to do, Moses put these two tablets containing the Original Message from God into the Ark (see Deut. 10: 1-5). Later, the contents of the original Ark were transferred and sealed into another Ark of wood and gold made by Bezalel of the tribe of Judah. This Ark served as a holy archive for the safe keeping of the sacred testimonies, reminders and messages. It also contained a golden jar having the manna and the rod of high priest Aaron. Before Moses died, he gave a copy of the "Book of Law" to the Levitical priests with instructions to place that copy not within the Ark of the Covenant of the Lord, but place it beside the sacred Ark. Moses added; "...let it remain there as a witness against you. For I know well how rebellious and stubborn you are. If you already have been so rebellious towards the Lord while I am still alive among you, how much more after my death!" (Deut. 31: 26-28). This Ark of the Covenant was brought by King David to Jerusalem. Today, the researchers like Mike Sanders believe that the Ark was probably destroyed by Ramesses III. The original Message of God that was bestowed upon Moses and written by Moses himself and placed by him in the Ark is no where to be found. IMPORTANT ADDITIONS RESPONSES FROM SILAS AND SAM SHAMOUN MY REFUTATIONS TO THOSE RESPONSES The combined responses from Silas (the original author) and Sam Shamoun (a colleague of Silas), is an article twenty-seven pages long and is divided into two parts. Since much of it is either irrelevant or deviates from the ORIGINAL CLAIM made by Silas that is under rebuttal, I am only reproducing the essential and related excerpts. Silas has claimed; "THE QURAN STATES THAT THE BIBLE IS TRUE". To this false claim I have rightly called a deception. Silas has now invited his "esteemed" colleague - Sam Shamoun, to play around with the well established and distinctly defined terminology "THE BIBLE" and to manipulate the ORIGINAL CLAIM. It is often, within the Divine Plan of Allah, to expose the deceit from the writings of those who wish to propagate falsehood in His name. The seekers of Truth may be elated to read how Sam Shamoun contradicts his colleague. After reading my refutations, if someone feels the need to read the entire lengthy response, the URLs for both the parts are given at the end. Silas writes: My esteemed colleague, Mr. Sam Shamoun, had already written an analysis of Meherally's "rebuttal." I have only added a few comments to his work. Hence the reader may see our work switch back and forth from first person to second, to third. It should not be difficult for the informed reader. Sam: I choose to call Meherally's response a deception for several reasons. First in order to call our readers' attention to Meherally's ad hominem slurs. Do note that Meherally begins his article with the bold claim that Silas' article is a falsehood and a deception. This is presumably done in order to poison the minds of Meherally's readers from seriously considering Silas' arguments. Yet, all Meherally has managed to do throughout his article is to expose his shoddy scholarship. As I shall shortly demonstrate the only one who is promoting falsehood and lies is Meherally. Instead of attacking a person's character and/or using cheap polemical
tricks, Meherally needs to show respect to those whom he
opposes. His attacks do nothing to help his case but only expose
his immature and unprofessional attitude.
Meherally: I did call the article written by Silas a deception, because the well established and distinctly defined terms BIBLE or THE HOLY BIBLE do not appear in the Qur'an. Even this twenty-seven page article has not been able to substantiate that which is non-existent. Earlier, I have already enumerated that which has been Revealed by Allah (s.w.t.) in His Book. If, Sam considers my calling Sisal's article a deception to be "ad hominem slurs", what does he consider his opening remark that reads: "I choose to call Meherally's response a deception"? Silas/Sam have quoted the following passage from my rebuttal The word "BIBLE" and/or the phrase "THE HOLY BIBLE" or their Arabic equivalents did not appear in the Qur'an that Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) used to recite in his days. Neither do they appear in the copies of the Qur'an that the Muslims do recite today. Furthermore, if one was to do the key-word search for the words BIBLE, OLD TESTAMENT or NEW TESTAMENT within the majority of the translated ENGLISH TEXTS of the Glorious Qur'an, the results would be ZERO. In other words, these words or phrases DO NOT appear in these translated texts of the Qur'an. To claim that the author of this article - Silas, (which could be a pen name) who uses the following sub-heading, was in reality not aware of the above mentioned facts, is to say that the author's work could not be relied upon. To say otherwise, would be to admit that Silas is the master of DECEPTION. The noteworthy sub-heading to be found within
the article by Silas:
Silas: Meherally's thrust here is that since the word "Bible" is not found in English translations of the Quran, then my assertion "THE QURAN STATES THAT THE BIBLE IS TRUE", is false. At this point, I need to say to Meherally,
"Meherally! Before you ‘rebut’ anything, please read all of it!!! Otherwise
you appear to be a barking dog or a
braying donkey." If Meherally would have bothered to read all of
my article, he would have found where I address his question. Meherally
is not the first person to make such an objection. Consequently, I specifically
addressed this in Section D, Muslim objection #2. So much time would be
saved if people bothered to read, and then be able to understand what they
read.
Meherally: If Silas had indeed addressed this question earlier, as he claims so vehemently, why has Silas not reproduced that text here and made the short end of this dialogue? Why has Silas invited an "esteemed writer" his aid? And, why this helper has written such a LENGTHY RESPONSE to prove that which has already been proven by Silas? The readers will find out, once they finish reading my entire response (part of which is yet under editing and typing) how baseless is the claim: "THE QURAN STATES THAT THE BIBLE IS TRUE". Surprisingly, Silas has completely overlooked and disregarded the advise given by his "esteemed colleague" of showing respect to those whom you oppose and introduced disrespectful and derogatory phrases as "a barking dog" and "a braying donkey". I wish to invite the attention of Silas - a follower of Jesus, to the following warning by Christ; "...and if you say, 'You Ra'cah', (a derogatory personal remark to another person), you will be liable to the fire of Hell." Matthew 5 : 22. Sam:
Meherally: Please make a note that Sam has claimed; the term BIBLE simply means "BOOK" (singular). Now examine what his colleague Silas has claimed for the same term BIBLE. Here is an excerpt from the original writings by Silas: Yet, if one were to trace the word Bible back to the Greek,Silas had argued in his original article that the word BIBLE means "books". However, the Arabic word "KITAB" -- that appeared in the Qur'anic Verse that Silas had quoted underneath -- was in its SINGULAR form. So, he now attempts to change that form Plural to Singular by introducing one more falsehood, as you will soon discover. On the other hand, Sam Shamoun simply changed the Greek word for the BIBLE to its singular form and then make it tally it with the Qur'anic term "KITAB". An ingenious method of changing the form of the crucial word in Greek, and then try to prove: "THE BIBLE" = "THE BOOK" = "THE KITAB". A helper invited by Silas to help, proves that Silas was wrong in his derivation. However, the Encyclopedia Britannia ( 1953) records; The English word "Bible" is derived through Mediaeval Latin from the Greek, which simply means "the books." The above published prestigious record proves Sam to be wrong and thus his attempt falls flat on its face unless Sam claims to be more knowledgeable!!! Silas continues:
Meherally:
Silas has claimed; "the author was one, the Holy Spirit." (see above). Again, a falsehood. The following text from the BIBLE exposes and demonstrate that to be a blatant falsehood. In his First Epistle to the Corinthians (one of the "66 Books" of the Bible), Paul admits in the opening verse, he is the author of this entire Letter. And, what he has written in verse 25 and 26 is "his" own opinion : "Now concerning virgins, I have no command of the Lord, but I give my opinion as one who by the Lord's mercy is trustworthy. I think that, in view of the impending crisis, it is well for you to remain as you are."Please visit again. Insha'Allah, more serious refutations will be added. Further 2nd Addition on February 2nd 2003 A typo error:
The following is a text reproduced from my
earlier Rebuttal:
It is absolutely incorrect or rather a folly
to claim that "The Taurat"
refers to the collection of the 39 Books of "The Old Testament". It is
an indisputable fact that this entire collection of 39 Books was not Revealed
to Prophet Moses. Similarly, it is ALSO incorrect to assert that
the First Five Books of the Old Testaments called "The Pentateuch" (lit.
"The Five Books"), which are often erroneously declared as the "Five Books
of Moses", were Revealed to Prophet Moses.
Below is the irrefutable proof that Prophet Moses did not write or dictate "The Pentateuch". The following historical account that appears in the end part of "The Pentateuch" and records what did transpire after the death of Moses could neither be qualified as Revealed by Allah Himself to Prophet Moses nor as The Book written or dictated by Moses nor as The text written during the lifetime of Moses. As seen earlier, the Qur'anic Term "The Taurat" refers specifically to the Revealed Transcript by Allah Himself to His Prophet Moses and within this Revealed Transcript was "The Guidance and the Light." A Muslim is asked in the Qur'an to believe in this "Taurat" and not in everything that is identified or published as "The Books of Moses" in the Bible. Here are two eye-opening passages from "The Fifth Book of Moses" which is known as "Deuteronomy": "Moses was one hundred twenty years old when
he died; his sight was unimpaired and his vigor had not abated. The Israelites
wept for Moses in the plains of Moab thirty days; then the period of mourning
for Moses was ended"
"Never since has there arisen a prophet in Israel like Moses, whom the Lord knew face to face." Deuteronomy 34: 10 The above text upholds the theory of Priestly
and other Sources in The Pentateuch.
-- The end of reproduction -- Sam's response to the above: Fourth, Meherally thinks that Deuteronomy 34 somehow refutes Mosaic authorship. Yet this only exposes Meherally's hypocrisy. Meherally claims and believes that Deuteronomy contains two prophecies about Muhammad, Deuteronomy 18:15-18, 33:2: 8. Finally, several millenniums before Christ
Jesus spoke for the coming of "another paraclete", the making of ISLAM
as a Great Nation was already in GOD'S MASTER PLAN and foretold in the
Holy Bible. God the Almighty had declared His Master Plan to His prophets
Abraham, MOSES, Solomon, Isaiah and Habakkuk. Here are few verses
from the Old and New Testaments. Genesis 17: 20; 21: 13-17-18; DEUTERONOMY
18: 15-18 AND IN PARTICULAR 33:2; Songs of Solomon 5: 10 to 16; Isaiah
42: 9 to 17 and Habakkuk 3: 3.
And: Nearly TWENTY CENTURIES before the birth of prophet Muhammad AND A SHORT WHILE BEFORE HIS OWN DEATH, PROPHET MOSES speaking on the subject of the Holy One from mount Paran, said to his people: (Source ) If Meherally believes that Moses predicted the coming of his prophet twenty centuries before Muhammad's birth, then on what basis does Meherally use Deuteronomy 34 to reject Mosaic authorship? It seems to have never occurred to Meherally that just as it was possible for God to reveal to Moses the advent of a prophet that came thousands of years later, God was also able to reveal to Moses the manner of his death and have him record it for future generations! Fifth, since Meherally accepts the Documentary Hypothesis and since this hypothesis rejects Mosaic authorship for the great bulk of the Pentateuch, how then does Meherally know that Deuteronomy 18 and 33 are genuine prophecies by Moses? On what basis does he accept Deuteronomy 18 and 33 as genuine while rejecting chapter 34? Interestingly, Meherally contradicts himself since elsewhere he calls Deuteronomy "the fifth book of Moses": The Message that Jesus had brought was the same as declared IN THE FIFTH BOOK OF MOSES, called Deuteronomy, which is: "Thou shalt have no other gods before Me." "Thou shalt not bow down thyself unto them, nor serve them; for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God..." ( Source ) So which is it? Is Deuteronomy the fifth book
of Moses or not? Meherally seemingly wants to have his cake and eat it
too and yet he can't have it both ways. Sadly, such shoddy scholarship
and deceptive methodology is a common feature of Meherally's articles.
Meherally: Please read carefully the opening sentence
from Sam's response. It reads:
I have for sure refuted the MOSAIC authorship for CHAPTER NUMBER 34, which happens to be the LAST CHAPTER of that Book. To uphold and support my refutation I have also quoted VERSES 7 - 8 and Verse 10 from Chapter 34. Now, please read once again the above quoted
misleading
Response of Sam.
If Meherally believes that Moses predicted the
coming of his prophet twenty centuries before Muhammad's birth, then on
what basis does Meherally use Deuteronomy 34 to reject Mosaic authorship?
It seems to have never occurred to Meherally that just as it was possible
for God to reveal to Moses the advent of a prophet that came thousands
of years later, God was also able to reveal to Moses the manner of his
death and have him record it for future generations!
Sam is trying to change the text of a post
Moses Historical Record into a Prophecy. Once again this ingenious scheme
falls flat on its face, before the following quote.
DEUTERONOMY AUTHOR:
Note: Joshua the son of Nun is the author of the next Book in the O/T. I have a suggestion for Sam, Silas and his
Organization:
Here is another passage from Sam's Response:
Meherally: Is Sam trying to tell his readers that he has
never opened the famous King James Version of the Bible and read the headings
of the Books of the Old Testament?
In the Glorious Qur'an the Chapter (Sura) Number 69 is called Al-Haqqa meaning THE REALITY. If Sam was to call that Chapter "The Reality", can anyone claim that Sam has acknowledged that Chapter to be THE REALITY (The Truth)? Sam makes a very serious erroneous claim below and then goes on to make the unwarranted serious remarks for the Glorious Qur'an: Finally and even more amazingly, it might come
as a complete shock to our readers to find that the Quran never actually
says that the Taurat was given to Moses. Instead, the Quran says
that Allah gave Moses the Book. This means that the only way for
Meherally to know whether the Taurat was given to Moses IS BY TURNING TO
THE HOLY BIBLE! Otherwise, Meherally can never prove from the Quran
itself that the Taurat was given to Moses. This
is another indication that the Quran is an incomplete and incoherent record.
Meherally: Insha'Allah, God Willing, I am about to EXPOSE
Sam that will not only SHOCK the readers, but will DISCREDIT him, once
and for all the times. What Sam has claimed is a FALSEHOOD, that none can
deny after reading the following verse that speaks of "AT-TAWRAAT"
being revealed to Moses. After reading the following translations and the
transliteration
Sam should sincerely lament and apologize
for having written the following falsehood for THE QUR'AN, I quote:
Here are the translations and transliteration of Verse 5: 44: Lo! We did reveal the Torah, wherein is guidance and a light, by which the Prophets who surrendered (unto Allah) judged the Jews, and the rabbis and the priests (judged) by such of Allah's Scripture as they were bidden to observe, and thereunto were they witnesses. So fear not mankind, but fear Me. And barter not My revelations for a little gain. Whoso judgeth not by that which Allah hath revealed: such are disbelievers. Translation by M. M. Pickthall It was We who revealed the law (to Moses);
therein was guidance and light. By its standard have been judged the Jews
by the Prophet who bowed (as in Islam) to Allah's will by the Rabbis and
the doctors of Law: for to them was entrusted the protection of Allah's
Book and they were witnesses thereto: therefore fear not men but fear Me
and sell not My Signs for a miserable price. If any do fail to judge by
Indeed We revealed the Taurat to Moses, in
which there is guidance and light: By its laws, all the Prophets, who were
Muslims, judged those who call themselves Jews and so did the rabbis and
jurists of law. They were entrusted the protection of Allah's Book and
they themselves were witnesses. Have no fear of people; fear Me, and do
not sell My revelations for a petty price: those who do not judge by the
law which Allah has revealed, are indeed kafirs (unbelievers).
'in(na) -naa anzalnaa at-
tawraah fe -haa huda(n) wa- nor yah.kum bi-
-haa an- nabeyon 'alladhena aslamo li- 'alladhena haado wa- ar- rabbaaneyon
wa- al- ah.baar bi- maa istuh.fiz.o min kitaab 'allaah wa- kaano calay
-hi shuhadaa' fa- laa takhshaw an- naas wa- ikhshaw -ni wa- laa tashtaro
bi- 'aayaat -e thaman(an) qalel(an) wa- man lam yah.kum bi- maa anzala
'allaah fa- 'olaa'ika hum al- kaafiron.
Here is the greatest shock:
THE GOSPELS:
In the Gospels, on the other hand, the characteristic variations are intentional, such as the addition or insertion of whole passages, some of which must certainly have been supplied from an external source. The longest is the whole story of the Woman taken in Adultery, inserted between John vii. 52 and viii. 12; others are a long insertion after Matt. xx. 28 (61 words), the saying about the Face of the Sky in Matt. xvi. 2-3 (31 words), the story of the Angel and the Bloody Sweat in Luke xxii. 43-44 (26 words), and many other shorter passages. No satisfactory paleographical explanation has ever been found for these variants; they are evidently made on purpose, by persons who had new matter to insert into the text and felt themselves at liberty to do so. The fact of the occurrence of these longer Interpolations (as they are usually called) prepares us to find that very many of the shorter variants are of the same nature, i.e., that they did not arise through scribal errors but by intentional efforts to improve or enrich the original.Further 3rd Addition on February 6th 2003 Meherally:
It seems to have never occurred to Meherally that just as it was possible for God to reveal to Moses the advent of a prophet that came thousands of years later, God was also able to reveal to Moses the manner of his death and have him record it for future generations! In my earlier response I had quoted the Vital Statistics for the Book of Deuteronomy, from the NEW REVISED STANDARD VERSION (NRSV). This Vital Statistics, written by the editors of the Bible acknowledged that Joshua was probably the author of that historical record and it was recorded after the death of Moses. In case Sam Shamoun refuses to accept that Vital Statistic here is my alternate response from the Biblical Texts. It seems that Sam has either not read the specific wordings and the language of these prophecies for the advent of a FUTURE PROPHET that are recorded in CHAPTER 18 and compared them with the wordings and the language of the PAST EVENTS that are recorded in CHAPTER 34. Or, Sam is fully aware of those obvious and glaring differences and is intentionally responding with "esteemed" style of pretentious hollow arguments. The opening words of Prophecy No. 1 recorded
in Deut. 18: 15 reads:
The opening words of Prophecy No. 2 recorded
in Deut. 18: 18 reads:
These prophecies REVEAL the Future Events in their Future Tenses. Now compare the wordings and language of the
following records in Deut. 34: 5 - 8
These historical events are all RECORDED
in their Past Tenses.
THE AUTHOR WAS ONE, THE HOLY SPIRIT Silas wrote:
Please read the following TEXT from the 'Book
of Isaiah', one
of the 66 Books.
(KJV) Isa 61:1 The Spirit of the Lord God {is} upon me; becauseApostle Luke records that Jesus went into a synagogue in Nazareth. He was given the Scroll of the prophet Isaiah to read. Jesus unrolled the Scroll and read. Please compare the following TEXT from the 'Gospel of Luke, one of the 66 Books. (KJV) Lk 4:18 The Spirit of the Lord {is} upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised,One would EXPECT, Luke to QUOTE here what we had read earlier from the "Book of Isaiah". But, he ADDED his own text and thus corrupted the Book. Here are two serious question
for Silas:
IF Silas is NOT YET READY to change his statement then Silas should disown the 'Doctrine of Trinity' the foundation of his Christianity. This Innovated Doctrine teaches that the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit are ONE. Did God Err??? Silas claims: "THE QURAN STATES THAT THE BIBLE IS TRUE". By the Grace of Allah, it has been established
WITHOUT ANY DOUBT:
Those interested in reading more on the Innovated
'Doctrine of Trinity' may click:
I close with a verse from the Glorious Qur'an:
Those interested in reading more on the Gospel
bestowed on Jesus, may click:
Here are the two URLs of Sam's response:
Since the above responses deal mostly with
the re-narrated Hadeeths and the works of Ibn Kathir, I suggest the readers
to read my two articles on the subjects:
Akbarally Meherally February 6, 2003
To read other articles by the author, please click INDEX 
Please send your comments to author
Akbarally Meherally at webmaster9@mostmerciful.com
|
|
|
|
|
||