TANGIBLE AND PERCEIVABLE
CONCLUSIVE PROOF

Islam
is the fastest growing religion.... WHY?
Here is the TANGIBLE and PERCEIVABLE
CONCLUSIVE PROOF.
Anyone at anytime and anywhere can Perform
the following experiment and obtain that PERCEIVABLE PROOF.
1.
INVITE 10 (TEN) people from everyday
life
who say;
"I am a Christian
and I have read THE BIBLE".
Ask them just one question:
"Who was Jesus,
according to THE BIBLE?"
Please note down
how many DISSIMILAR BELIEFS
you have obtained....
2.
INVITE 100 (HUNDRED) people from everyday
life
who say;
"I am a Muslim
and I have read the QUR'AN".
Ask them just one question:
"Who was Muhammad,
according to the QUR'AN?"
Please note down
how many DISSIMILAR BELIEFS
you have obtain...
IF THE TOTAL NUMBER
OF DISSIMILAR BELIEFS,
PERCEIVED &
UNDERSTOOD FROM THE BIBLE,
BY 10
CHRISTIANS
DOES
EXCEED THAT OF
THE TOTAL NUMBER
OF DISSIMILAR BELIEFS,
PERCEIVED &
UNDERSTOOD FROM THE QUR'AN,
BY 10O
MUSLIMS
WHAT
DOES THAT PROVE CONCLUSIVELY???
SELF CONTRADICTIONS
WITHIN A DIVINE SCRIPTURE !!!
MUSLIMS
HAVE ONLY ONE BELIEF
(Muhammad
was the Messenger & the Servant of Allah)
REBUTTAL FROM answering-islam.org
Please visit http://www.answering-islam.org/Responses/Meherally/meh12_0.htm
to read the rebuttal to this article. You may be surprised to see
the followings:
1. The Critic writes:
(First off, you'll
have a hard time finding 10 Muslims who have
read the Qur'an in Arabic...
a. How many Christians
would the Critic find, out of 10, who have read the Old Testaments in Hebrew
and the New Testaments in Greek?
(Here
again the Muslims would outnumber the Christians)
b. Is the Critic trying
to tell us that those who have read the translations of the Bible and/or
the Qur'an are not to be trusted?
2. The Critic's
LOGIC IS FLAWED AND DEFECTIVE by asking
those who have read THE
QUR'AN:
"What is a Muslim according to the Qur'an?"
And those who have read THE
BIBLE:
"What is a Muslim according to the Qur'an?"
Should not the Critic be asking those who have
read THE BIBLE
"What is Christianity according to the Bible?"
3. It is obvious
that the Critic has knowingly side-stepped the basic issue of the DIVERSIFIED
BELIEFS that the Bible reading Christians have for their CHRIST JESUS from
their own HOLY BIBLE.
One may argue Jesus WAS
NOT GOD and other may argue Jesus WAS GOD, by quoting enigmatic odd verses
from the same Bible.
Whereas, the QUR'AN is very clear as to the
eminence of Muhammad.
The Critic has not reproduce the last line
of my article which reads:
(Muhammad was the Messenger & the Servant of Allah)
Please send your comments to:
webmaster9@mostmerciful.com
To visit the Home Page or to read other articles by the author click:
INDEX
|