| |
EXAMINING
THE
SELF CONTRADICTORY
TESTIMONIES
BY PAUL
During the ministry of Jesus,
Saul (who later became Paul), was a dedicated member of a powerful exclusive
Jewish sect called Pharisees. These overbearing vainglorious Jews were
labeled as stiff necked hypocrites, for their pretensions to sanctity.
When they confronted Jesus, he called them; the sons of a liar.
"You are of your father the devil, and the
lusts of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning,
and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh
a lie he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it."
John 8:44
Saul, was a zealous persecutor of the
disciples of Christ. Later on, he became the first Christian missionary
and a Minister to the Gentiles. He claims to have been converted to Christianity
(in c.e. 35), by an extraordinary sudden appearance of a light from the
heaven which flashed around him. (Acts 9:3). This historical "Vision"
is supposed to have came about on a road, during Saul's journey to Damascus.
By his own statement; Saul's intended mission for this journey was to persecute
more Christian men and women. After this historical "Vision"
the
persecutor changed his mission. He also changed his name to Paul. He ultimately
became the biggest contributor to the New Testament. History records that
Paul's teaching has changed the Christian beliefs. He was vehemently opposed
by other Apostles. Hence, this study is very essential for those who call
themselves Christians but in reality following the teachings of "Saint
Paul" and NOT of Christ.
A question of the fundamental importance
is; If the story of "Vision" by Paul, who
had never before met Jesus, is the Truth then; What
did Jesus really say to Paul? There was only ONE VISION, but we
find contradictions of very serious nature within the following two narration
describing the single event. Both these narrations are told by Paul himself
and recorded in the "first person". Often I hear from the evangelical Christians,
in the defense of these glaring contradictions; there must be an error
on the part of the one who wrote down these narrations (probably Apostle
Luke). Paul did not write the Book of Acts. If that defense is to be admitted
then we have also to admit that Book of Acts is not a hundred percent trustworthy
or reliable Book of the Bible.
Narration
No. 1:
<Acts 22:1ff>. While defending himself before the people of Jerusalem,
Paul narrated the first narration in the Hebrew dialect; "Brethren and
fathers, hear my defense which I now offer to you." <Verses 6ff>
"And it came about that as I was on my way, approaching Damascus about
noontime, a very bright light suddenly flashed from heaven all around me,
and I fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to me, 'Saul, Saul, why
are you persecuting Me?' And I answered, 'Who art Thou, Lord?' And He said
to me, 'I am Jesus the Nazarene, whom you are persecuting.' And those who
were with me beheld the light, to be sure, but did not understand that
voice of the One who was speaking to me. And I said, 'What shall I do,
Lord?' And the Lord said to me, 'Arise and go into Damascus; and
there you will be told of all that has been appointed for you to do."
Note:
In this first narration, Paul tells us that Jesus Christ simply directed
him to go to the City of Damascus and there he will receive instructions
from some one. Paul does not mention having personally received the "instructions"
concerning his ministry and/or his mission "directly"
from
Jesus Christ, which
is recorded in the Narration No. 2. The Book of Acts later confirms that
Paul DID get the instructions in the city of Damascus from one of the disciple
of Jesus Christ.
A narration very similar to the above is also
found in Acts 9:5ff.
Narration
No. 2:
Acts 26:12ff. While defending himself before King Agrippa Paul narrates
the incident in first person; "While thus engaged as I was journeying to
Damascus with the authority and commission of the chief priests, at midday,
O King, I saw on the way alight from heaven, brighter than the sun, shinning
all around me and those who were journeying with me. And when we had all
fallen to the ground, I heard a voice saying to me in the Hebrew dialect,
'Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me? It is hard for you to kick against
the goads'. And I said, 'Who are Thou, Lord?' And the Lord said, 'I am
Jesus whom you are persecuting. But arise, and stand on your feet; for
this purpose I have appeared to you, to appoint you a minister and a witness
not only to the thing which you have seen, but also to the things in which
I will appear to you; delivering you from the Jewish people and from the
Gentiles, to whom I am sending you, to open their eyes so that they may
turn from darkness to light and from the dominion of Satan to God, in order
that they may receive forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among those
who have been sanctified by faith in Me."
Note:
In this second narration, Paul says; Jesus Christ himself
personally gave all the instructions for his
future role as a minister. And, Jesus Christ himself
personally appointed Paul as his Minister. Paul
did not mention in this narration about Jesus telling him to take the instructions
from some one else when he goes to the City of Damascus.
Similarly, in the earlier narration Paul did
not mention he was given any instruction of his Ministry directly by Christ
himself during the Vision.
This cuts down the defense that Paul was given
the "Instructions" directly, as well as told to take more "Instructions",
when in Damascus.
WHAT IS THE TRUTH?
IF Jesus had already
given
the needed guidance to Paul and also
made
him the Minister then why the story of a disciple
of Jesus named Ananias breaking the news of
appointment to Paul, three or four days later
in the city of Damascus, who already knew it? (see Acts 22:14)
Defense
from the readers:
The common defense that I have
so far heard from the readers is that the
first narration is a shorter version of the encounter and the second is
a longer version. To this I say; please read
carefully the above "Notes"
and
the "Question" with
an open mind and then "honestly" and "truthfully" reflect, if you are indeed
a Seeker of The Truth,
Does NOT the Second Narration contradict and
repudiate the First Narration? If it does,
then would an appointee of Christ make TWO self
contradictory statements and then go against
the teachings of Christ?
Remember Jesus said:
"..and the truth shall make you free". Jn 8:32.
Fundamental
Question:
Did Jesus Christ personally
speak of the sanctification by faith in Jesus, as
narrated in the second narration by "Saint Paul"?
If your
answer is YES: Then the text which reads, "And the Lord said to
me, "Arise and go on into Damascus; and there you will be told of all
that
has been appointed for you to do" should be the UNTRUTH.
If your answer
is NO: Then the rest of the writings of Paul and Paul's theory of
Justification
by Faith, should be the UNTRUTH.
Finally, if you are at a Cross
Road; Which path should you take?
A path shown by a so called "Minister" of
Jesus, or a path shown by the "Messiah" of
God, if they both differ in the fundamental teachings? Please
read Mt. 5:19 and 19:17.
A Recent Christian Criticism
on the subject:
Under
the heading; "Responses to Akbarally Meherally's site", Section A, Part
4, sub-heading "Paul's Authority" and under the URL
http://www.answering-islam.org/Responses/Meherally/
the Christian Critic responds to the above question of Cross
Road as under:
"Amen! I choose to follow
Jesus and His servant Paul."
My Comments to the Critic's reply:
I have read that the Almighty
God,
under the Trinitarian Concept, could
exist simultaneously as "Three Persons". And, could supposedly take THREE
different paths simultaneously living in Three different forms. But, I
have not read that a Believer of Trinity could also exist simultaneously
as "Two Persons" and could take Two different paths, one going to the Right
and the other going to the Left!!!
I wonder, where would
"he" go to sleep, at the end of the day?
THE CONTRADICTORY RECORDS...
On this fundamentally vital subject of the discourse between Jesus
and Paul, it is recorded as under, in the Book of Acts:
That the men traveling with Paul,
stood speechless, hearing the voice, but seeing no one. (9
:7)
That the men traveling with Paul,
saw
the light but did not hear the voice of the one who was speaking to Paul.
(22
: 9)
Can the above discordant records be defended
as the longer and the shorter records? Surprisingly,
in chapter 26 there is no mention of men seeing or hearing anything, although
the discourse recorded here is much longer than those recorded in chapters
9 and 22 !!!
YOU BE THE JUDGE...
I am repeating below the story that I tell my audience:
Say, you went to a Sermon and heard a Minister saying that last month
while he was sitting on a bench in a park an elderly man came and set next
to him. The elderly gentleman identified himself as a Professor of Theology.
The Minister asked the Professor: "How to have an eternal life?" The Professor
suggested that he should go to the public library get a particular book
by the famous author and read the relevant chapter on the subject.
The Minister thereupon go to that library and borrowed that book and read the
suggested chapter. He added; It was an enlightening material on the subject
of Eternal Life and he was fortunate to have met that Professor of Theology.
Say, the next Sunday you went to another Church and happen to
see the same Minister speaking from the pulpit of that Church. The Minister
repeats the same story and also repeat asking the same question to
the same Professor. But, this time the Minister changes that story. He tells
that the Professor of Theology opened his brief
case, took out the book by that famous author and the Professor read the entire chapter on the subject of Eternal Life to the Minister.
Say, if you were to raise your hand and ask that
Minister; "How many times have you met this Professor of Theology?" And, if
that Minister was to reply: "My son, I have met this Professor only once."
Please tell me;
Would you like to hear the rest of his Sermon???
- Did Paul meet Jesus once or more than once, on his
way to Damascus?
DID JESUS GIVE THE MESSAGE DIRECTLY TO PAUL ON HIS
WAY TO DAMASCUS OR TOLD HIM TO GO TO DAMASCUS FOR THE MESSAGE?
- TO SAY BOTH ARE TRUE HISTORICAL
FACTS IS TO SAY I LOVE LIES...
Paul's Confession to his Falsehood!!!
Please read below what Paul has questioned
to the readers of his Epistle, and then you be the Judge of Paul's Confession
to Falsehood.
Paul interrogates:
"But if through my falsehood ("lie" in K.J.V.),
God's truthfulness abounds to his glory, why am I still being condemned
("judged" in K.J.V.), as a sinner?"
Romans 3:7 (N.R.S.V.)
Would you knowingly and consciously encourage
your own children to resort to "Falsehood" so that they may Glorify the
God before others?
Does your God seek such "False Glory" from
you or your children??
Jesus claimed he was "the Truth" (Jn. 14:6);
and he preached "the Truth shall make you free" (Jn. 8:32); and he also
declared that the "another Advocate" that was to come after him would be
"the Spirit of Truth" (Jn. 14: 16/17), under the circumstances it is most
unlikely that he would personally appoint anyone to carry forward his mission
that would "through his falsehood" try to Glorify the truthfulness of God.
 |
|