|
A HISTORY OF THE AGAKHANI
ISMAILIS
(Section Six)
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH
THE BENEFICENT,
THE COMPASSIONATE
Continued from Section Five
UNFORSAKEN ANCESTRAL RITUALS
AND BELIEFS
"Caught within the meshes of
Hindu Law"
It is an undisputed fact that the converted
Khojahs had been observing Hinduistic as well as Islamic rites and rituals,
even after their conversion. Many of these converts believed it was in
their social and business interest to hold on to their former Hindu identities
and continue their trade and cultural relationships with their former kinsmen.
Hence, many of them accepted Islam but did not adopt Islamic names or change
their dresses. Even today, one comes across Khojah families whose last
names are Ramji, Shamji, Kanji, Govindji, and so forth.
John Norman Hollister, quoting from Hamid
Ali's work, Customary and Statutory Law, Islamic Culture, XI (p. 355),
writes in The Shi`a of India (pp. 399-400):
The Khojah community has been "caught within
the meshes of Hindu Law," and to such an extent has "Customary Law" become
applicable to the community, that their legal position to-day "is as baffling
to the law courts as it is to the Legislature."
1930 A.D. — Aga Khan III favours
Hindu custom
When a civil suit was initiated by two Khojah
sisters for a share in their deceased father's estate against Aga
Khan I, he "upheld the rules of female inheritance as laid down in Islamic
law," records Dr. Farhad Daftary (p. 514).
When a suit was filed against Aga
Khan III, he went against the Muslim law and favoured Hindu custom.
Dr. Hollister writes (p. 400):
...in 1930, a suit against His Highness
the Agha Khan to set aside a will which provided a bequest of "nearly seven
lakhs' worth of property to the Agha Khan, and only a small property" to
sisters of the widow and some distant relatives was dismissed. On this
occasion the influence of the Agha Khan was against Muslim law, and in
favour of "custom" which was Hindu practice.
1945 A.D. — Aga Khan refuses to
purge (Hindu) Avtaras from Ismaili prayers
In 1945, under the chairmanship of the late
Aga Khan, a conference of Agakhani missionaries was held in Dar-es-Salaam.
Aga Khan strongly criticized those who wanted him to eliminate the names
of Hindu manifestations (Avatars) and the phrase "'Ali
sahi (truly) Allah" from the Ismaili Du'a.
Aga Khan explained to his missionaries
that such terms and phrases have symbolic significance and, as such, should
not be tampered with. Diamond Rattansi has given details of this Mission
Conference in his thesis for the M.A. degree at McGill University. He records
that as a result of the above decision there appears to have been sporadic
manifestation of some opposition to the Aga Khan from the Ismaili splinter
groups and the Sunni Muslims.
"The Kur'an is considered the
last of the Vedas"
Under the heading "Ismailis," the Encyclopedia
of Islam says:
While idol worshipping is condemned,
Hindu mythology is accepted. 'Ali is described as the Tenth Avatar or incarnation
of the deity, and the imams are identical with him. The Kur'an is considered
the last of the Vedas, which are viewed as holy scriptures whose true interpretation
in known to the pirs. The religious role of the pir or guru is extolled.
Acceptance of the true religion will free the believer from further rebirths
and open Paradise for him, which is described in Islamic terms, while
those failing to recognize the imams must pass through another cycle of
rebirths.
A heresy!
The so called "Badakhshani Ismailis" living
in the remote mountain enclaves of northern Pakistan and Central Asia;
the "Arab Ismailis" living in Syria; and the "Persian Ismailis" living
in Iran, who also recognize Karim Aga Khan as their Hazar (present) Imam
and spiritual father and mother, do not fall within the fold of this group
of "Khojah Ismailis." Unlike the Khojah Ismailis, their ancestors were
not Hindus. They refuse to recognize Hazrat 'Ali ibn Abi Talib as the tenth
Avatar (incarnation of a Hindu deity called Vishnu). They strongly resent
this dualistic Khojah belief. Any attempt,
legitimate or otherwise, to associate or connect physically or spiritually,
the Shi'ah concept of "Imamate" with the Hindu doctrine of "Incarnations"
would be a heresy in Islam. And they would have no part in it.
"Das Avatar" (the ten incarnations)
Today, the younger generation of Khojah Ismailis,
living under the influence of Islamic culture within the Islamic State
of Pakistan, do realize and admit that this legendary union of Hazrat `Ali
with Shri Rama and Shri Krishna, and the linkage of Revealed Books of the
Middle East with the Hindu scriptures, is a heresy.
In Pakistan, because of social and political
pressure, a curtain has been officially dropped by the Ismaili Tariqah
and Religious Education Board on these deluded convictions. Recitation
of Ginans containing Hinduistic elements is strictly banned in the Jama`at
khanas of Pakistan. But that is not the universal standard for the Ismailis.
Many Khojah Ismailis living outside of
Pakistan are holding on to this fallacious certitude. For them these ancestral
beliefs, based upon epic stories, are bona fide truth and the founding
concepts of their religion. The Ismaili Tariqah and Religious Education
Board in Canada, for example, has been promoting Hindu elements in its
seminars, expositions, preaching, and teachings.
Below are some of the reasons why the
Khojah Ismailis refuse to forsake their ancestral rituals and beliefs:
1. Until
the mid-1950s, Khojah Ismailis living in India and Africa recited in their
Du'a (prayer) the names of all the major and minor incarnations of Vishnu,
the names of characters from the Hindu scriptures and epic tales.
2. Until
the 1950s, the recitation of a Ginan called "Das Avatar" by an upstanding
congregation, once a month on a new-moon night called Chandra`at, was a
ritual strictly observed in all the Ismaili Jama`at khanas of the world.
The book of "Das Avatar" in Gujrati and English, published by the religious
institutions of the Aga Khan, was sold throughout the world.
3. Until
the 1960s, the verses from "Das Avatar" were invariably recited during
the final moments of a dying Ismaili and thereafter at funeral ceremonies.
The verses of "Das Avatar" communicate that listening to this Ginan rewards
the listener with eternal salvation.
An advocate of Avatar theory may argue:
How can the founding concepts of a religion be forsaken? How can the Tenth
Incarnation of Rama and Krishna suddenly cease to be an Incarnation after
one generation or two? Hence, the Ginans with Hindu elements that lead
us to "our heritage" must be preserved, learned, and recited.
Aga Khan's perceptions of "Krishna,
and Ram"
Quoted below is a passage from the Memoirs
of the Aga Khan (page 174):
All Islamic schools of thought accept
it as a fundamental principle that, for centuries, for thousands of years
before the advent of Mohammed, there arose from time to time messengers,
illumined by Divine grace, for and amongst those races of the earth which
has sufficiently advanced intellectually to comprehend such a message.
Thus Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and all the Prophets of Israel are universally
accepted by Islam. Muslims indeed know no
limitation merely to the Prophets of Israel; they are ready to admit that
there were similar Divinely inspired messengers in other countries — Gautama
Buddha, Shri Krishna, and Shri Ram in India, Socrates in Greece, the wise
men of China, and many other sages and saints
among peoples and civilizations of which we have now lost trace.
The Ismaili students' syllabus —
1986
The Ismailia Association, published a syllabus
in winter 1986 called the SMREC Student Binder, coordinated by Mrs. Khurshid
Allahdini, an Ismaili scholar at the Institute of Ismaili Studies, London.
According to the Confidential Report published by Mehboob Kamadia (p. 105),
the syllabus preaches to the mission class students of grade 7 as follows:
He (Pir Sadardin) wrote Das Awtaar,
which is still a very important religious book of the Khojas. The concessions
made to a non-Islamic Faith to win the followers was never more clearly
shown than in this book. The nine incarnations
of Vishnu are accepted, and Ali is represented as the tenth, each
incarnation being treated in a chapter....Other correlations that are made
in the system of Sadr al din are: Brahma with
Muhammed, Adam with Shiva, and Ali with Vishnu. Islam Shah, the Imam of
the time, became an incarnation of Ali, Nur Satgur of Brahma and Sadr al
din himself of Balaram. The five Imams of
Alamut (Hasan Ala'Zikrihis Salaam through Ruknuddin) were correlated with
the five Pandavas.
The above report, which says "Das
Awtaar, which is still a very important religious book of the Khojas,"
clearly proves the point that the Khojah Imami Ismailis of 1987 have not
forsaken the Hindu mythologies. This kind of reporting at the Civil Suit
in Karachi had led the judge to pronounce "IT
IS NOT POSSIBLE TO CONCEIVE THAT A PERSON CAN ADOPT PURE AND TRUE ISLAMIC
IDEALS AND PRACTICES AND AT THE SAME TIME REMAIN AN `ISMAILI AGHAKHANI'."
Bhagavadgita and Aga Khan's birth
in India
In the mid-1940s, after graduating from a religious
night school in Bombay, I joined a special Mission Class consisting of
young graduates, initiated to raise a young breed of Ismaili missionaries.
These classes were conducted by one of the Aga Khan institutions named
the Recreation Club — the predecessors of today's Shi`ah Imami Ismaili
Tariqah and Religious Education Board. The so-called "Recreation Club"
was in fact a "Propaganda Club." and was located in one of the Jama`at
khanas of Bombay.
We, the next generation of propagandists,
were expected to memorize a few of the selected verses from various scriptures
in their original languages. Here is a verse in Sanskrit from a Hindu scripture
that the students were required to memorize:
Yada, Yada, hi dharmasya glaneer bhavti
Bharat abhyut'thanam adharmasya, tadat'mahnam sarjamyaham paritrana shadhunam
vinashay chadushaktam dharm sunsthapana thai sambhawhami yuge yuge
This probably translates like:
Whenever, whenever, there is disintegration
of religion in India, and anti-religious activities prevail at that time
I take birth to protect saints and ameliorate through religion.
We were taught that in accordance with the
recited verse, the long-awaited physical manifestation of the final incarnation
had already been born in India. Aga Khan III,
the only Imam (a manifestation of Allah in the Ismaili concept) that had
been born (manifested) on the soil of India (Karachi, 1877), was the one
that would fulfill the words of the quoted scripture. Aga Khan would ameliorate
the world and unite Hinduism, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.
Aga Khan III died in 1957 without ameliorating
India or integrating religions. Ten years before his death, India was partitioned
into India and Pakistan. Hindus and Muslims grew further apart than they
had been when Aga Khan was born.
'Ali becomes "Eli" of the Bible
Before the advent of the Fatimid Dynasty, a
strange doctrine had evolved. Ismailis believed that each and every Prophet
that had come upon this earth had had an intimate companion called Asas
("foundation"). Since the Prophet communicated with the members of his
community he was called Natiq (a speaker).
The companion of a Prophet — an Asas — was
called Samit (a silent one). The Asas silently assisted the Prophet in
his mission.
Adam's son Seth was an Asas with the
Prophet Adam; Shem was an Asas with the Prophet Noah; Ishmael was an Asas
with the Prophet Abraham; Aaron was an Asas with the Prophet Moses; initially
John the Baptist was an Asas; and later on Simon Peter was an Asas with
the Prophet Jesus; 'Ali ibn Abi Talib was an Asas with the Prophet Muhammad
(peace be upon all the Prophets). Every Asas is labeled
'Ali of his era.
The above explanation is necessary to comprehend
the philosophy of Ismaili missionaries, who misinterpret the desperate
cry of Jesus Christ "Eli, Eli" from the cross
and the desperate call "Ya 'Ali adrikni" by Prophet Muhammad, upon whom
be peace, on the last day of the battle of Khaibar.
According to them, both these calls for assistance by the speaking Prophets
were for their silent companions.
The deliberate confusion created by the
Ismaili missionaries is totally based upon similar sounding words "Eli"
and "'Ali." The Aramaic phrase that Jesus Christ uttered was "Eli, Eli,
lama sabachtani?" which translates "My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken
me?" (Matthew 27/46).
As for the call by the Prophet for 'Ali
is based upon a mythological account of the battle of Khaibar recorded
by the author of Noorum-Mubin for which there is no historical evidence.
As for an example, Noorum-Mubin records (p. 4) that 'Ali uprooted the heavy
iron gate of the fort with his bare hands and placed it over the trench.
The gate was short to cover the trench from one end to the other, and Hazrat
`Ali held the other end of the gate in his hand. The Muslim army crossed
over the gate and conquered the fort.
Prince Aly Khan would ride "Dul-dul"
In August 1930, Aga Khan sent his eldest son,
Prince Aly Khan, to visit Syrian Ismailis. He also dispatched a special
Farman to his Syrian Jama`at. This Farman was recorded by A. J. Chunara,
the author of Noorum-Mubin. (p. 531).
"We are sending our son to you. Consider his
arrival as my arrival. We are appointing our Prince as our "Wali-ahad"
meaning the successor to our throne."
To commemorate this occasion, a Durbar (royal
pageant) was held in Salamiyya. The governor of Salamiyya read Aga Khan's
"Holy Farman." Thereafter, members of the Syrian Jama`at took the Bay`ah
(literally, a pact, an oath of allegiance) at the hand of the future Imam
and offered him Nazrana (gifts). During this visit to Syria, Aly Khan rode
an Arabian horse and wore an Arab dress. A photograph of this appears in
Noorum-Mubin (p. 530) with the following caption in English:
H.S.H. Prince Aly S. Khan Heir
Apparent to Mowlana Hazar Imam, in the Arab
costumes of his forefathers, during his visit to Syria.
Ismailis of India, Africa, and Burma celebrated
this appointment of Prince Aly with special Majlises and Melawadas. A deputation
of Ismaili leaders presented Peramni (special gifts) to Lady 'Ali Shah
at her bungalow in Valkesh'war, Bombay, records Noorum-Mubin, p. 532.
In our Mission Class, we were told by
the senior missionaries that Prince Aly the future forty-ninth Imam would,
during the period of his Imamate, manifest himself before the world as
Hazrat 'Ali, the first Imam. On the day of his Zahurat (manifestation),
Aly Khan would wear an all-white Arab dress and ride the legendary white
horse "Dul-dul." In his right hand would be Zulfiqar, the undefeated sword
of Mawla 'Ali. To support their speculation, our teachers would quote a
Ginan in Gujrati: Dul-dul gode Ali chadseh
Shah....
Setback number 1 for Zahurat
On the 25th day of May 1955, Sir Sultan Mahomed
Shah Aga Khan, G.C.I.E., G.C.S.I., officially signed his last will at the
Hotel Ritz, London. In this document (p. 6), Aga Khan stated:
...notwithstanding that under the Shia
Moslem Law the issue of a son is not an heir if there be a son alive....
In other words under Shi'ah law, Karim, the grandson,
could not be designated as an heir to the throne of Imamate as long as
Karim's father or uncle was alive.
On 12 July 1957, the abovementioned will
of Aga Khan III was read in his villa in Geneva. It stated (p. 6):
I APPOINT my grandson KARIM, the son
of my son ALY SALOMONE KHAN to succeed the title of AGA KHAN and to be
the Imam and Pir of all my Shia Ismailian followers....
By his signature on the Will document, the
"all comprehensible" Imam had reversed his pronounced decree of "Wali-ahad,"
broken the admitted Shi`ah law of designation and shattered the dreams
of Ismailis who were expecting Aly Khan to
manifest as Hazrat `Ali riding on Dul Dul with the sword Zulfiqar in his
hand.
"Spiritual father of his own
father"
Biographer Willi Frischauer records in The
Aga Khans (p. 210):
Bettina ...wrote: 'To Aly it seemed that his
father's preference for his son was a kind
of public humiliation for him... He was never
quite the same from that day on. His deep sadness took cover beneath a
life of still more inhuman activity.'
...In Bettina's words — which might well
reflect Aly's feelings at the time — Karim
was now the spiritual father of his own father.
"Shah Aly Khan Hazar Imam Zindabad"
A majority of the Syrian Ismailis and a few
Khojah Ismailis of Punjab revolted at this unprecedented designation. They
refused to recognize the appointment of a grandson as their Imam. The group
acknowledged Aly Khan as their forty-ninth Imam.
To avoid a possible split in the community,
Aly Khan went to Syria, met the leaders of the revolting Ismailis, and
explained that his father had chosen his son Karim as the next Imam. In
Karachi, the leaders of the group gathered outside the residence of Amir
Ali Fancy, President of the Federal Council for Pakistan, and began shouting
"Shah
Aly Khan Hazar Imam Zindabad," meaning; "Long live the majestic Aly Khan,
the present Imam."
Aly Khan met the leaders of the group
and assured them that he too had accepted his son Karim as the rightful
Imam. The revolting Ismailis were left with no other choice but to accept
Karim Aga Khan as their forty-ninth Imam. In Ismaili history, Prince Aly
will be remembered for his generosity by accepting his humiliation without
protest.
Later on, a story began to circulate
among his close associates that the Prince had been talking to few of his
trusted friends about making a clean breast and testifying before the Jama'at
about "divinity and the divine power of the Ismaili Imams," after his initiation.
The news may have reached the ears of the late Aga Khan, who might have
changed his decision about his son.
Aly Khan's pre-nuptial affair during
April 1935 at the Hotel Ritz in Paris with Mrs. Thomas Loel Guinness, the
mother of Karim Aga Khan; his marriage to actress Rita Hayworth; and his
friendship with Lise Bourdin Bettina, Juliette Greco, Gene Tierney, Kim
Novak and other Hollywood personalities might be some of the social reasons
for the change of heart of the Aga Khan.
A recent note:
Based upon the recent news published in the newspapers, the Ismaili
community is about to face the worst possible crisis in their entire history,
on the issue of the succession to the throne of Imamat. A crisis that could
wipe out the community from its roots in the next generation.
Princess Zahra, who is married to a Christian, could be the future
Hazar Imam!
Aly Salomone a child of Mut'ah
In his Memoirs published in 1954, Aga Khan
III writes (p. 104):
From 1907 onwards I visited Europe every year,...I
had lost my heart to the French Riviera. Now in my maturity my affection
for it had deepened and ripened, and I found myself returning to it again
and again. In 1908 this affection found a personal focus. I made the acquaintance
of Mlle. Theresa Magliano, one of the most promising young dancers of the
Ballet Opera of Monte Carlo, a ballerina....She was then just nineteen....In
the spring of that year she accompanied me to Egypt
and we were married in Cairo in accordance with Muslim law.
Three years after the publication of his Memoirs,
Aga Khan signed his will. We find an interesting version of "the Muta form
of marriage" in that document (p. 4):
In the year One thousand nine hundred
and eight I was married to CLEOPE TERESA MAGLIANO according
to the Muta form of marriage....On the twenty-third
day of January One thousand nine hundred and twenty-three I went through
the
permanent form of marriage with my said wife
CLEOPE TERESA MAGLIANO in Bombay observing the ceremonials which are customary
among Shia Moslems.
Having insisted in his Memoirs published just
before his death, that he had married Mlle. Magliano "in accordance with
the Muslim Law" the Aga Khan shortly afterwards in his Will admitted that
he was married to her "according to the Muta form of marriage" and that
fifteen
years later he "went through the permanent form of marriage,"
in Bombay.
Mut'ah "a marriage of pleasure"
Biographer Willi Frischauer writes in The Aga
Khans (p. 75):
Although some Muslim writers (among
them Mr. Asaf A. A. Fyzee, writing in the Aga Khan Diamond Jubilee Souvenir
Book, 1945) have claimed that 'mut'a (temporary marriage)...is, according
to Ismaili Law, altogether unlawful...' the
Aga Khan himself, supreme arbiter of Ismaili religious practices, obviously
did not concur because he mentioned in his Will that he had married his
second wife 'by mut'a marriage'.
The Concise Encyclopedia of Islam (Harper and
Row, 1989) describes "Mut'ah" (p. 291) as follows:
A marriage stipulated to be temporary,
sometimes called a "marriage of pleasure." The marriage is automatically
terminated at the end of the agreed period.
Out of this temporary marriage, two sons were
born within a period of three years. The first son was named Giussepe Mahdi
Khan, who died in February 1911. The second son, named Aly Salomone Khan,
was born in Turin, Italy, on 13 June 1911. Aly Khan's birth certificate
describes his mother
as "Teresa Magliano, unmarried 22 years old,
living on independent means," and his father as "His Highness The Aga Khan,
son of the late Aga Ali Shah."
Setback number 2 for Zahurat
In December 1983, an interview with Karim Aga
Khan was prominently published by Life magazine, which is widely circulated
throughout the world in several languages. In the opening paragraph of
the interview, reporter Margot Dougherty wrote: "To 15 million Muslims
in 25 countries, he is a living god, direct descendant of Mohammed and
the spokesman for almighty Allah."
To the vast majority of Aga Khan's followers,
these assertions by Life were a kind of worldwide acknowledgment of their
concealed beliefs. For the fundamentalist
it was a primary step in the right direction for the public declaration
Zahurat. Photocopies of the published interview
were prominently displayed on bulletin boards of the Jama'at khanas. Copies
were widely circulated among Ismailis throughout the world.
To avoid a backlash of negative publicity
from the Islamic Ummah (Universal Brotherhood), Karim Aga Khan immediately
disavowed these assertions publicly, through his secretariat. In the February
1984 issue of Life, there appeared a letter from the Secretariat denying
in the strongest possible terms both of the above assertions as the most
serious misrepresentations by Life and a serious affront to all Muslims.
This was a second setback for the propagandists of the Zahurat.
A recent prediction based upon
the Qur'an
In spite of this public denial and explicit
repudiation by Karim Aga Khan's Secretariat, Ismaili missionaries continue
their mission of propagating the legendary beliefs about the Imam's Zahurat.
A well-known Ismaili, Da`i Allamah Nasir al-Din `Nasir' Hunzai of Pakistan,
has recently made a most outrageous prediction in his Urdu book Imam —
Shinasi.
Claiming that the word "Nur"
meaning "Light" has been mentioned 49 times
(it has not) in the Holy Qur'an,
the author goes on to unashamedly equate this
with the 49th Imam (as per Ismaili claim)
and the dawn of the atomic age. By any standard, this so called "dawn"
ushered in mainly by the United States and not by Ismailis is one of the
greatest threats facing mankind starting off with Hiroshima and Nagasaki
atomic holocaust.
The book has been translated into English
by an Ismaili scholar, Khan Muhammad, under the title Recognition Of Imam.
The prediction reads as follows:
Reflect well upon this great wisdom
of God, may He be exalted, that the word light [Nur] is mentioned forty-nine
times in the Wise Qur'an and our celebrated and glorious present Imam,
Shah Karimu'l-Husayni, `alahi's-salatu wa's salam, is also the forty-ninth
Imam in the holy succession of Imamat in the progeny of the Holy Prophet
and descendants of Mawlana `Ali. Thus it is not impossible in the wisdom
and power of God that, in this number of word "light," the Holy Qur'an
predicts that in the blessed age of the forty-ninth attire of the light
of Imamat, both the world of religion and the physical world, will be illumined
by the spiritual and physical knowledge and wisdom. As is evident that,
as a special sign, the atomic age has begun in the blessed age of the present
Imam and man has hoisted the flag of victory and success on the moon in
order to conquer the universe. Since we are sure of this prediction of
the verses of light, that now, by the grace of God, both physically and
spiritually, it is the age of light and its reign....
Note: In the concordance of the Qur'an published
by the University of California and compiled by Professor Hanna E. Kassis,
the word "Nur" (Light) is mentioned 43 times
and not 49 times.
Karim Aga Khan's view on Fundamentalism
On 12 August 1991, an interview with Karim
Aga Khan was published in the Financial Times. The interviewers were William
Dawkins and Edward Mortimer. Here is an extract from the published interview:
Fundamentalism is "divisive of society and
damaging to the Islamic world's ability to deal with the modern world,"
he mourns. But he is confident that Islamic
radicalism, almost unknown among the Ismailis
themselves, will die away.
It is interesting to note that in the above text,
Islamic fundamentalism and radicalism are portrayed as meaning the same
thing when they do not.
If one were to examine Karim Aga Khan's
own ability to deal with the modern world — managing Europe's leading thoroughbred
racing and breeding business, managing first-rate hotels that provide all
amenities and luxuries to foreign tourists — one would understand the difference
between Modernism and Islamic Fundamentalism. The later forbids gambling,
bans the drinking and serving of intoxicating liquor, eating and catering
pork, prohibits seductive stage shows, and so on.
As an ardent defender of the Islamic
laws, the government of Saudi Arabia had not in the distant past raided
Aga Khan's Jama'at khana in Riyadh, filmed the ceremonies conducted therein,
jailed the participants and thereafter deported all his followers from
the country, as personae non gratae or non-Muslims,
hence, one may be inclined to say, this mourning and death wish!
Causes of the Muslim downfall
On 18 August 1991, an interview with Karim
Aga Khan in Granada, Spain, was published in the Guardian Weekly of England.
The interviewer was Akbar S. Ahmed. Here is an extract from the published
interview:
He [Karim Aga Khan] talks of the loss
of vigour, the drying-up of initiative, the emphasis on empty dogma as
causes of the Muslim downfall here [Granada]. There are parallels today:
"Those
who wish to introduce the concept that you can only practise your faith
as it was practised hundreds of years ago are introducing a time dimension
which is not a part of our faith."
In the above statement, Karim Aga Khan has in
effect repeated the message of his grandfather's Farman published in 1950
by the Ismailia Association for India (p. 241), in which he pronounced
that if the Qur'an was self-sufficient in guiding the Mominins (devouts)
Hazrat 'Ali would not have been designated as his successor by the Prophet.
The Imam of the time is always present to guide the Mominins in the best
possible manner, according to the changing times and in view of new discoveries.
The Imam's Farmans change with the times, and Mominins ought to obey these
Farmans.
The Imam's Farmans have indeed changed
the concepts of Ismaili faith and as a result Ismailis have discarded the
ancient preaching, including those that are prescribed in the Qur'an, such
as ablution before praying, facing in the direction of Mecca while praying,
fasting during the month of Ramadhan, pilgrimage to Ka'bah, reciting noon
prayers on Fridays, greeting each other with "As Salaam Alaykum" meaning
"Peace be upon you," and so on. Should the
Islamic Brotherhood follow the footsteps of Ismailis to prevent their down-fall?
However, there is one exception. When
the question arises of discarding the Ginanic preaching prescribed nearly
seven centuries ago Ismailis defend them as "our
heritage." They are not
Dr. Azim Nanji, an Ismaili scholar, writes
in his article "The Art of the Ginan Narrative," published in the Imamat
Day Issue of the Ismaili magazine Hikmat in July 1991 (p. 27):
"[Ginans] continue to be preserved, learned and recited as part of a living
legacy and an uninterrupted expression of religious teaching and devotion."
Whenever there appears a news item in
the media relating to Ismailis, Karim Aga Khan is shown as a religious
head of 12 or 15 million Muslims. The figure is grossly over exaggerated.
Whoever are feeding this information are either not aware of the true facts
or are trying to keep up with the traditional pride of exaggerating the
number.
From 20 million to 1 million
followers
Harry Greenwall has quoted extracts from several
articles written by the Aga Khan III in the British media during the early
years of his Imamate. In one such article, quoted on page 46, Aga Khan
wrote:
I am a direct descendant of the Prophet,
and a large number of the Mohammedan faith
to-day, numbering about twenty millions — acknowledge me as their head.
As far as I am aware, no true Muslim would call
himself or herself Mohammedan. This was the term that continued to be used
by the British to identify Muslims, often deliberately and in spite of
the repeated protests by Muslims. The Christians are so named because they
happen to worship Christ. Muslims do not worship "Mohammed," a term used
by the British for Prophet Muhammad, upon whom be peace.
In a special "Birthday" issue of Ismaili
weekly published on 19 January 1942,
the population of those who worship Aga Khan is shown to
be 20 million. The figure, which should have
multiplied, remained the same after one generation. Today, after
two more generations, the figure published
in the media has dropped to between 15 to
12 million followers of Karim Aga Khan.
Enno Franzius writes in History of the
Order of Assassins (p. 227):
In an effort to ascertain the number
of Assassins [Nizari Ismailis] in the world, the author wrote to several
Assassin authorities on three continents. Apart from one estimate of fifty
million, he encountered a wall of silence.
If
he were pressed to express an opinion, he would venture the view that press
reports of ten to fifteen million are exaggerated and conjecture that the
followers of the Aga Khan do not exceed three
million.
Even this figure of three million is a serious
exaggeration. The true figure is under one million. The stories about millions
in China, Russia, etc., have never been substantiated. Indeed, no attempt
has ever been made for the simple reason that it would not stand up to
even cursory scrutiny.
"Ismailism is the Islamic parallel
to Gnosticism"
Under the heading "Isma'ilis," The Concise
Encyclopedia Of Islam (Harper and Row, 1989, p. 194) says:
A sect which is usually considered to
be a Shi`ite branch of Islam. This classification, however, can be misleading.
Isma`ilism's Shi`ite affinities do not constitute its essential element.
Rather, it is the metaphysics of Isma`ilism which is its singular characteristic.
The sect is a manifestation within Islam of ancient Persian religious systems.
Islam gives them an outer clothing, a form, and a vocabulary, but the central
core of Isma`ilism is far more ancient.
Isma'ilism
is the Islamic parallel to Gnosticism (the alternative Dualist form of
Christianity), and is related to Hellenistic pagan Gnosticism, and Manicheism.
Those
who pervert the Truth
Those who pervert the Truth in Our Signs
are not hidden from Us.
Which is better? —
he that is cast into the fire,
or he that comes safe through,
on the Day of Judgment?
Do what ye will:
Verily He seeth (clearly) all that ye
do. Holy Qur'an
41/40
Commentary by A. Yusuf Ali:
Pervert the Truth in Our Signs: either
by corrupting the scriptures or turning them to false and selfish uses;
or by neglecting the Signs of God in nature around them, or silencing His
voice in their own conscience. Everything is known to God. Why not work
for the true salvation at the final Judgment?
Please click HERE to
read Section Seven

|